Оцена Теме:
  • 2 Гласов(а) - 2 Просечно
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

#2

...



Russian PRAVDA on 11.15.2000 reports a sensational news of how, on October 17, Russian Air Force had twice buzzed the US task force headed by the Kitty Hawk aircraft carrier. Reconnaissance aircrafts Sukhoi 24MR flew unnoticed, at nearly zero Sukhoi 24MRaltitude, over the aircraft carrier and even managed to take photos of the ship. Only after a second pair of Su-24 planes buzzed the Kitty Hawk did the carrier scramble an F/A-18 fighter to intercept the intruders, the Interfax agency reported.

These details were made known to journalists today by Russia’s Air Force Commander-in-Chief Anatoli Kornukov. He said that it was a scheduled reconnaissance, and that routine tasks were being solved there while the American were taken by surprise.” Panic on the aircraft carrier’s deck can be seen very clearly on the photos", Interfax reports. “The quality of the pilots’ work has been highly assessed by the Chief-of-Staff, and they will be decorated,” the Commander-in-Chief added.

Click on above PRAVDA logo to see the article.

This makes one wonder. Or radar systems and their crew on US ships were not operational, or they could not detect incoming threat. It is possible that the Sukhois could have been flying very low, skimming the sea surface, but this must be easily detectable by apposite radar system.

And what about that device which is small enough and light enough (around 100 kg) ?

---

21 April, 09:59

Russian Su -24 scores off against the American "USS Donald Cook"



Photo: RIA Novosti

http://indian.ruvr.ru/2014_04_21/Russian...Cook-5786/

Russian Sukhoi Su -24 with the newest jamming complex paralyzed in the Black Sea the most modern American combat management system "Aegis" installed on the destroyer "USS Donald Cook". Pavel Zolotarev, Deputy Director, Institute of USA and Canada, shares details about this version which is being actively discussed in the Russian media and by bloggers.

US destroyer "Donald Cook" with cruise missiles "Tomahawk" entered the neutral waters of the Black Sea on April 10. The purpose was a demonstration of force and intimidation in connection with the position of Russia in Ukraine and Crimea. The appearance of American warships in these waters is in contradiction of the Montreux Convention about the nature and duration of stay in the Black Sea by the military ships of countries not washed by this sea.

In response, Russia sent an unarmed bomber Su- 24 to fly around the U.S. destroyer. However, experts say that this plane was equipped with the latest Russian electronic warfare complex. According to this version, "Aegis" spotted from afar the approaching aircraft, and sounded alarm. Everything went normally, American radars calculated the speed of the approaching target. And suddenly all the screens went blank. "Aegis" was not working any more, and the rockets could not get target information. Meanwhile, Su-24 flew over the deck of the destroyer, did battle turn and simulated missile attack on the target. Then it turned and repeated the maneuver. And did so 12 times.

Apparently, all efforts to revive the "Aegis" and provide target information for the defence failed. Russia's reaction to military pressure from the United States was profoundly calm, feels the Russian political scientist Pavel Zolotarev:

The demonstration was original enough. A bomber without any weapons, but having onboard equipment for jamming enemy radar, worked against a destroyer equipped with "Aegis", the most modern system of air and missile defence. But this system of mobile location, in this case the ship, has a significant drawback. That is, the target tracking capabilities. They work well when there is a number of these ships which can coordinate with each other somehow. In this case there was just one destroyer. And, apparently, the algorithm of the radar in the "Aegis” system on the destroyer did not load under the influence of jamming by the Su-24. It was therefore not only a nervous reaction to the fact of flying around by the Russin bomber which was common practice during the Cold War. The reaction of the Americans was due to the fact that most modern system, especially its informative or radar part, did not work adequately. Therefore, there was such a nervous reaction to the whole episode.

After the incident, the foreign media reported that "Donald Cook" was rushed into a port in Romania. There all the 27 members of the crew filed a letter of resignation. It seems that all 27 people have written that they are not going to risk their lives. This is indirectly confirmed by the Pentagon statement according to which the action demoralized the crew of the American ship.

What are the possible consequences of the incident provoked by the U.S. in the Black Sea? Pavel Zolotarev forecasts:

I think that Americans are somehow going to reflect on improving the system “Aegis". This is a purely military aspect. In political terms, there is hardly any likelihood of demonstrative steps by either side. That is enough. Meanwhile, for Americans it is a very unpleasant moment. In general, the missile defence system which they deploy involves huge expenditures. They have to prove each time that it is necessary to allocate funds from the budget. At the same time, the ground component of the ABM was tested in ideal conditions and showed a low efficiency. This fact is concealed by the Pentagon. The most modern component, the sea-based system "Aegis" also showed its shortcomings in the present case.

The system with which the Russian Su-24 shocked the American destroyer "Donald Cook" has the code name "Khibiny". This is the name of the mountain range on the Kola Peninsula in the Arctic Circle. "Khibiny" is the newest complex for radioelectronic jamming of the enemy. They will be installed on all the advanced Russian planes .

Recently the complex has undergone regular testing exercises on the ground in Buryatia. Apparently, the tests which were conducted under conditions as close to real as possible, were successful.

---

USS Donald Cook Welcomes President of Romania

Story Number: NNS140415-12Release Date: 4/15/2014 10:46:00 AM

http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=80370

From U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa/U.S. 6th Fleet Public Affairs

CONSTANTA, Romania (NNS) -- The forward deployed guided-missile destroyer USS Donald Cook (DDG 75) welcomed aboard Romanian President Traian Basescu while the ship was in port in Constanta, April 14.

Basescu was met by members of the U.S. Embassy and Donald Cook's Commanding Officer Cmdr. Scott Jones. He was then given a tour of the ship, including the Navigation Bridge, Combat Information Center and Engineering Control.

"Operating in the Black Sea has been an incredible opportunity for us to further strengthen our ties and improve our interoperability with an important strategic partner, Romania, who just recently celebrated their 10th anniversary as a member of NATO," said Jones. "We feel that this is an important time to demonstrate our resolve and shared commitment with NATO; that we will maintain the right presence where it matters to promote peace and stability."

Donald Cook's visit to Romania is an example of the U.S. Navy's commitment to strengthen ties while working toward mutual goals in the Black Sea. This multi-mission destroyer is there to reassure our NATO allies that we share a commitment to promote peace and stability in the region.

"We have also been privileged to host several members of the Romanian navy during our time in the Black Sea," added Jones. "This professional exchange has been valuable for my crew, allowing us a chance to discuss future exercise opportunities, and helping to reinforce, on a personal level, the strong ties between our two navies and our two nations."

Donald Cook, the first of four Arleigh Burke-class destroyers to be forward-deployed to Rota, Spain, is serving on a scheduled patrol in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of operations as part of the President's European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) to ballistic missile defense in Europe.

U.S. 6th Fleet, headquartered in Naples, Italy, conducts a full range of maritime security operations and theater security cooperation missions in concert with coalition, joint, interagency, and other parties in order to advance security and stability in Europe and Africa.

Is the USS Cook going to be replaced?

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wire...t-23419231

Appears something is discreetly assembling the chess pieces?

http://www.haaretz.com/misc/article-prin...m-1.586684
Одговори


Поруке У Овој Теми
WWW III - од Захумље - 23-04-2014, 01:08 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 23-04-2014, 06:33 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 23-04-2014, 10:49 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 24-04-2014, 03:35 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 24-04-2014, 05:46 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 25-04-2014, 05:11 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 25-04-2014, 07:57 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 27-04-2014, 06:08 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 29-04-2014, 12:35 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 29-04-2014, 06:31 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 30-04-2014, 05:15 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 04-05-2014, 02:43 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 04-05-2014, 03:55 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 05-05-2014, 12:48 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 08-05-2014, 08:21 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 09-05-2014, 08:01 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 11-05-2014, 12:14 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 14-05-2014, 03:06 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 15-05-2014, 10:07 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 16-05-2014, 12:23 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 16-05-2014, 05:47 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 17-05-2014, 05:41 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 19-05-2014, 04:51 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 22-05-2014, 02:36 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 24-05-2014, 09:47 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 31-05-2014, 07:40 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 03-06-2014, 09:07 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 09-06-2014, 06:55 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 15-06-2014, 04:35 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 16-06-2014, 03:55 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 05-07-2014, 02:14 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 09-07-2014, 08:49 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 19-07-2014, 03:11 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 21-07-2014, 04:50 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 21-07-2014, 07:50 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 24-07-2014, 06:35 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 27-07-2014, 06:51 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 29-07-2014, 05:20 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 29-07-2014, 08:07 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 02-08-2014, 07:17 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 04-08-2014, 07:53 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 05-08-2014, 03:19 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 06-08-2014, 02:50 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 07-08-2014, 09:02 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 10-08-2014, 03:59 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 12-08-2014, 08:26 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 13-08-2014, 04:12 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 14-08-2014, 02:57 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 14-08-2014, 04:00 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 14-08-2014, 05:12 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 15-08-2014, 08:57 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 16-08-2014, 04:42 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 17-08-2014, 03:41 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 17-08-2014, 06:41 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 18-08-2014, 06:14 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 19-08-2014, 02:28 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 21-08-2014, 02:03 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 24-08-2014, 05:49 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 29-08-2014, 02:33 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 30-08-2014, 06:40 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 31-08-2014, 01:14 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 02-09-2014, 06:30 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 03-09-2014, 04:39 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 03-09-2014, 07:58 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 04-09-2014, 06:48 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 05-09-2014, 03:16 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 06-09-2014, 01:09 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 06-09-2014, 06:37 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 09-09-2014, 01:34 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 09-09-2014, 05:30 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 11-09-2014, 12:07 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 12-09-2014, 06:54 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 13-09-2014, 07:05 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 20-09-2014, 03:31 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 21-09-2014, 07:12 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 23-09-2014, 06:15 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 23-09-2014, 09:33 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 29-09-2014, 03:03 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 01-10-2014, 02:48 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 02-10-2014, 11:53 PM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 03-10-2014, 02:21 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 04-10-2014, 12:38 AM
RE: WWW III - од Захумље - 05-10-2014, 04:07 AM
RE: WWW III - од Брада - 31-01-2017, 08:18 PM
RE: WWW III - од Прст_у_ока_латиници - 08-03-2017, 01:49 AM
RE: WWW III - од Прст_у_ока_латиници - 07-04-2017, 02:11 PM
RE: WWW III - од Прст_у_ока_латиници - 14-05-2017, 09:31 AM

Скочи на Форум:


Корисника прегледа ову тему: 1 Гост(а)
Све форуме означи прочитаним