[Захумље]

They’re Getting Ready For Something! – Viral Facebook Martial Law Post Just One Of Many In Recent Days Showing Mass Military Prep!
July 17th, 2014
Share22 Tweet2
1 Share0


The 3 newly released videos below include a viral Facebook post, broken down by videographer strongtower0914, that shows a military convoy in between Kentucky and Tennessee. Are they preparing for martial law as Joshua A. Wilcox suggests in the video?

While Facebook trolls hit hard at once, attempting to debunk the significance of this 1st video, the other videos below, also published on YouTube within the last few days, tell the story of what’s really unfolding all across America as the last days of this monetary system near and World War 3 vs Russia/China emerges on the world stage.

Is such weaponry as seen below now being prepared to be used against the enemies of the luciferian New World Order? With the large number of medical vehicles seen, are they preparing for mass casualties or the medical needs of immigrants arriving in America? These videos, all released within days, clearly tell a story that facebook trolls and the mainstream media don’t want us to know about.



Below: Published on Jul 11, 2014

I was taking a walk downtown New Haven, MO and a CSX Train went by and it had all this Military Equipment on it. I thought it was neat so I took a short little video.



Below: Published on Jul 15, 2014

CSX 7903 leads a Military Train at Townline Rd. at S. Blackmar, located just south of Bridgeport, MI. As noticed in the video, at least one person is impatient to wait and runs the crossing seconds before the trains crosses. Please excuse my opinionated comment towards this driver! (Train begins at 1 minute 30 seconds)



http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theo...64092.html


Read more at http://investmentwatchblog.com/theyre-ge...BiSyH8s.99

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJP1HpqYpks

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYCg7_qVLzo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sU5RpQvEM1Q

---

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2014/0...operation/

PROOF THAT THE U.S. FINANCIAL SYSTEM IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE OPERATION

PROOF THAT THE U.S. FINANCIAL SYSTEM IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE OPERATION
20
Jul, 2014
by Dave Hodges
Print this article
Font size -16+
death by a 1000 cuts

What was revealed in the previous article should shake the confidence that the public has in the DEA and the federal government as a whole. My DEA insider has revealed that there is massive, unchecked banking fraud and money laundering occurring within our financial institutions. Our banks are run like a Mafia protection racket. If you doubt the accuracy of this statement, ask yourself why are we witnessing a massive kill off of banking officials from the nation’s largest banks? The answer is simple, dead men tell no tales.

The following is not entertainment reading. This is a systematic report which details certain DEA operations and it is the story of how justice is muted when it comes to drug trafficking. There is complicity in these illegal enterprises from official government and corporate entities, particularly the banks. If being amused is the goal of your reading, today, you might want to skip over this article. However, if you truly desire to begin to get an idea of how things work, then you will not be disappointed.

Before revealing the partial extent that money fraud has been revealed to me, let’s review the major facts as ascertained by my DEA informant.

1. The SANCHEZ-Paredes drug cartel provides the bulk of drugs to the Sinaloa cartel.

2. The SANCHEZ-Paredes cartel is protected by the American trained Peruvian military and has strong ties to Hamas, an international terrorist organization.

3. The last three DEA special agents who attempted to investigate the SANCHEZ-Paredes were fired by DEA station director, Patrick Stenkamp. The leaders of the SANCHEZ-Paredes cartel travel freely to the United States and own homes in the country. This would require the State Department and the DEA “to look the other way”.

4. In Chicago district court testimony, it was revealed that the Sinaloa cartel struck a deal with the DEA to provide intelligence on other cartel drug shipments in exchange for a guarantee for shipping in 80% of its drugs to the United States without interference. As outrageous as this claim was, the validation of this fact did not require the revelation of an informant. The media coverage of this event is overwhelming, even if it was mostly ignored by the MSM. Defenders of the deal say that this is the cost of catching most of the drug dealers and drug shipments. Skeptics see the DEA as being involved in protecting the drug shipments of the elite from competition.

This installment reveals, to some extent, the existence of an elaborate money laundering scheme which must exist in order to legitimize the drug profits.

Before presenting the money laundering schemes, let’s first take a look at banking laws that the average American citizen must follow.

The Banking Regulations That You Must Follow

There are definitive banking regulations that you, as an American, must follow. If you do not, you go to prison for a very long time. Let’s review the draconian regulations that you you must follow, but the federal government and its agencies, such as the DEA and the State Department have no similar restrictions.

Cash Transaction Report (CRT)

Federal law requires that a bank file a report based upon any withdrawal or deposit of $10,000 or more on any single given day. The law was designed to put a damper on money laundering, sophisticated counterfeiting and other federal crimes.

To remain in compliance with the law, financial institutions must obtain personal identification, information about the transaction and the social security number of the person conducting the transaction.

Technically, there is no federal law prohibiting the use of large amounts of cash. However, a CTR must be filed in ALL cases of cash transaction regardless of the reason underlying the transaction. This means your cash transaction will be on the radar. And when the feds come knocking, it will be up to you to prove your innocence as there will be a presumption of guilt because, more than likely, your accounts will be frozen or seized by the federal government.

Structuring and Suspicious Activity Report (SAR)

There will undoubtedly be some geniuses whose math ability will tell them that all they have to do is to withdraw $9,999.99 and the bank and its protector, the federal government will be none the wiser. It is not quite that simple. Here are a few examples of structuring violations that one should be aware of:

1. Barry S. has obtained $15,000 in cash he obtained from selling his truck. He knows that if he deposits $15,000 in cash, his financial institution will be required to file a CTR. Instead he deposits $7,500 in cash in the morning with one financial institution employee and comes back to the financial institution later in the day to another employee to deposit the remaining $7,500, hoping to evade the CTR reporting requirement. Barry should have used multiple accounts to conduct this transaction. The Feds will be visiting Barry.
2. Hillary C. needs $16,000 in cash to pay for supplies for her arts and crafts business. Hillary cashes an $8,000 personal check at a financial institution on a Monday. She subsequently cashes another $8,000 personal check at the bank the following day. Hillary is careful to have cashed the two checks on different days and structured the transactions in an attempt to evade the CTR reporting requirement. Hillary should have made irregular deposits on staggered days. The Feds will be visiting Hillary.
3. A married couple, Bill and Hillary, sell a vehicle for $12,000 in cash. To evade the CTR reporting requirement, Bill and Hillary structure their transactions using different accounts. Bill deposits $8,000 of that money into his and Hillary’s joint account in the morning. Later that day, Hillary deposits $1,500 into the joint account, then $2,500 into her sister’s account, which is later transferred to Bill and Hillary’s joint account at the same bank. Again, Bill and Hillary should have used multiple banks. The Feds will be visiting Bill and Hillary.

The aggregate total of the three transactions totals more than the $10,000 threshold, therefore, a SAR would be filed by the bank and you would be the subject of a federal investigation as all three of the above cases clearly violate the federal banking laws related to structuring. It is a federal crime to break up transactions into smaller amounts for the purpose of evading the CTR reporting requirement. In these instances, the bank is required to file a SAR which serves to notify the federal government of an individual’s attempt to structure deposits or withdrawals by circumventing the $10,000 reporting requirement.

Structuring transactions to prevent a CTR from being reported can result in imprisonment for not more than five years and/or a fine of up to $250,000. If structuring involves more than $100,000 in a twelve month period or is performed while violating another law of the federal government, the penalty is doubled.

The Draconian Enforcement of Banking Laws

Much like the enforcement of our tax laws, the federal government’s enforcement of its banking laws as it relates to CTR’s, SAR’s and subsequent structuring is quite draconian. Civilian asset forfeiture laws come into play. The government can seize your bank accounts while it determines if a crime has been committed. There is no more presumption of innocence. The government can literally seize your assets in perpetuity without an order of the court. Of course, you could try and sue, but you will be up against the deep pockets of the federal government and the case could take years. By the time your case is decided, the financial banking crisis that you are so desperately trying to avoid by withdrawing your money, could be over.

In the following paragraphs, you will quickly see that that the drug cartels and the agencies of trhe federal government do not play by the same rules as you and I.

The DEA Runs Interference for Money Launderers

In subsequent voice and written communications, my DEA insider source revealed the following, “We identified a Peruvian Sanchez-Paredes cartel money laundering storefront in Miami called “Pacific Gateway”. Pacific Gateway is a known money laundering source. An analysis of Pacific Gateway yielded an unpublished telephone party line number located in Lima, Peru that was owned by the Sanchez-Paredes gold mine company, Minersa San Simon. Telephone analysis showed that this number was communicating with stateside numbers connected to a dozen DEA, FBI and ICE cases involving drugs, money laundering and organized crime”. Subsequently, the DEA agents in Peru concluded that they had found “dirty agents” in these three federal agencies who were helping the SANCHEZ-Paredes cartel and the elite in this country who profit from drug trafficking, to launder their drug profits inside of the United States. Pacific Gateway was the port of entry for laundered Peruvian drug money and the DEA office in Lima had the proof as well being able to identify members of the FBI, DEA and ICE as participants in this plot.



Very quickly, the DEA special agents in Peru learned that major U.S. financial institutions were involved in the money laundering scheme. The DEA informant went on to say that, “We also noted that Peruvians associated with Pacific Gateway were operating in Phoenix and Connecticut. Phoenix made sense because of its proximity to the border and the easy access to the Sinaloa cartel and the need to launder money was obvious. However, the Connecticut connection made no sense, that is until one follows the flow of money. A financial analysis demonstrated that Met-Mex Penoles, a Mexican gold company, is headquartered in Connecticut. Met-Mex Penoles underwrites the retirement system for the entire Peruvian Military.” This is how the Peruvian military is paid off.

(Editor’s Note: I have learned that Met-Mex Penoles is connected to Goldman Sachs and its partner, Wells Fargo Wachovia. Hence, we see the drug money now making it into the major players of the American financial system. And this is only one of the major ways that drug money was being laundered into major American banks). Outside of my DEA informant, I can prove these major banks, turned money laundering institutions, go even deeper. and are more deeply involved in this plot than anyone can imagine.)



State Department Complicity



It is at this point, ir is important to mention that the State Department is complicit in these money laundering schemes. It should be noted that all overseas financial transactions by the DEA must first be approved by the State Department. This means that nobody gets investigated, outside the United States, unless the State Department sanctions the expenditure. This gives the State Department complete power to kill any investigation and the State Department has done just that with regard to the SANCHEZ-Paredes cartel.



My DEA insider source further stated that, “The report which I submitted on my last day in the office was never published and a month after I submitted it the telephone number which we monitored went dead. All my efforts to find out why the report was not published we’re stonewalled by DEA management as there was no money in which to conduct an investigation. Remember, the State Department controls all foreign DEA spending. Further, it was revealed in Part One that the known criminals and leaders of the SANCHEZ-Paredes traveled freely to the United States where they also own homes. This would take State Department cooperation as well”.



The informant went on to describe how a Peruvian generated report he filed led to the bust of a SANCHEZ-Paredes/Sinaloa drug ring in New York. He stated that “Prior to leaving Lima I provided a draft to DEA New York who used the information to seize $30 million dollars all of which was subsequently returned to the Sanchez-Paredes. This can be confirmed by news reports and official Southern a district of New York press releases”. One needs to understand that the State Department could not block the funding of the New York investigation because the operation was domestic. However, despite a money laundering asset seizure of $30 million dollars, the money was returned to the drug cartel(s). This means that the Department of Justice had to intervene. Why was the money returned to these criminals? Remember, in Part One, the Sinaloa cartel members gave testimony in a Chicago court that they had reached an agreement to provide intelligence information to the DEA in exchange to bring their drugs into this country.



The Department of Homeland Security and the FBI Are Involved In the Cover-Up



Serendipitously, I have interviewed John Cruz on a number of occasions on my radio show and much of the money laundering plot revealed to me by the DEA informant, was stumbled upon by Mr. Cruz. John Cruz was a former Vice President at HSBC bank in New York. John discovered that many of the accounts under his purview were money laundering enterprises in which the address for a series of bank accounts were no more than an abandoned houses or buildings with nothing more than a phone line. His investigation demonstrated that the Sinaloa cartel was the primary player in the money laundering on the part of HSBC bank. When Cruz approached senior level management at HSBC, he was told to keep his mouth shut or he would lose his job. John subsequently went to DHS and the FBI where he was ignored and he was fired by HSBC. He then went to the Manhattan District Attorney and he was advised to drop the matter because this was too dangerous to pursue. Cruz has written a book about his ordeal. The Cruz case also exposed the fact that these cartel members steal identities in order to open these “fake” accounts at HSBC bank. This is significant because we always here that identity theft is such an important issue and that the government is doing everything they can do to mitigate the danger, when in fact, these same government entities are complicit in the crime.

Last year, I interviewed decorated ex-FBI and DEA operative, Robert Mazur. Mazur was involved in the taking down of the Pablo Escobar cartel. He also participated in busting the BCCI banking scandal. On my show, Mazur named off a half a dozen large banks that are complicit in money laundering drug money. In the final analysis, the DEA insider’s story is not really needed to make the case that our entire financial system is a criminal enterprise system. However, his revelations show the operation details and how legitimate law enforcement agents cannot really do their job.

Conclusion

HSBC bank is the “bankers bank”. This means that Bank of America, JP Morgan, etc., bank with HSBC. If they are dirty, then the whole banking system is dirty. These are the banks that comprise the Federal Reserve which runs our financial system.

In this article, we have seen the cooperation of DEA, the State Department, the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. If legitimate DEA special agents do not have anywhere to turn with their field work discoveries, then how can any American trust the financial system? People have criticized me for advocating for getting as much of your money out of this corrupt financial system as possible. Perhaps the defenders of the system, may want to take a second look at a criminal system that they put so much faith in.

The American financial system is a criminal enterprise endeavor. Both federal and corporate entities have conspired to break this nations laws. You are expected to follow the laws as they related to CTR’s, SAR’s and structuring. However, the federal government breaks everyone of these laws on a daily basis. It is a case of rules for thee but not for me!



One might also want to ask what to the multitude of dead bankers have to do with this plot?

In addition to these revelations, the DHS insider also gave me details on how the DEA will be involved in upcoming gun confiscation, the Continuity of Government for the false flag events which could be coming and the preparations for mass detentions in this country. The DEA is so dirty that they even eat their own. More on these issues in a future installment on this series.

---

http://ministerfortson.com/?p=33963

[Захумље]

http://www.teapartycrusaders.com/u-s-pol...ke-action/

22 Jihad Training Camps in the US – FBI Refuses to Take Action

Posted on Sunday, August 3rd, 2014 at 12:05 PM.
by: Santo Lippo
8acaec86e6a0a8cb25bc620b11a07f79

BY: BRANDON WALKER

There are over 22 confirmed terrorist Jihad camps in the United States belonging to Jamaat ul-Fuqra, a Pakastan Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda related branch. Now a combined media effort, we find police officers working to double as the compound militia. To top it off, the FBI states that their hands are tied in monitoring their activities despite a training video that is years old, possible murders, and proof of illegal activities.

The fact is these training camps are not a new item that have popped up on the Homeland Security radar. These training camps are being operated by an extremely militant group of international terrorists, an organization called Jamaat ul-Fuqra. In order to live in these camps, you must pledge to support a Pakastani Cleric on the International Wanted list. As early as 2012, the media confirmed 19 Jihad camps on United States soil.



The group of Muslims of America (MOA) are documented to have a connection to terrorism with training inside the United States. There was a 2002 unsolved murder at one of these compounds in Texas. When the Clarion Project obtained the 2007 FBI document detailing the Texas Enclave of MOA, what they found was deeply disturbing.

The organization says it has a network of 22 “villages” around the U.S., with Islamberg as its main headquarters in New York. TheClarion Project obtained secret MOA footage showing female members receiving paramilitary training at Islamberg. It was featured on the Kelly File on FOX News Channel in October. A second MOA tape released by Clarion shows its spokesman declaring the U.S. to be a Muslim-majority country.

A 2007 FBI record states that MOA members have been involved in at least 10 murders, one disappearance, three firebombings, one attempted firebombing, two explosive bombings and one attempted bombing. It states:

“The documented propensity for violence by this organization supports the belief the leadership of the MOA extols membership to pursue a policy of jihad or holy war against individuals or groups it considers enemies of Islam, which includes the U.S. Government. Members of the MOA are encouraged to travel to Pakistan to receive religious and military/terrorist training from Sheikh Gilani.”

The document also says that, “The MOA is now an autonomous organization which possesses an infrastructure capable of planning and mounting terrorist campaigns overseas and within the U.S.” ~Clarion Project

It got even worse when they tried to find out why the FBI, in a time where we are supposed to be at one of the highest levels of national security, has done nothing about it for years. After all, the Clarion Project found out that the compound had been raided in 1991 in connection to a foiled bomb plot in Toronto. Several of the members had been filmed training as militants. This was not a new situation. This should have been something DHS jumped quickly on.

[Захумље]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement
http://rt.com/usa/177892-sovereign-citiz...st-threat/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9a9PYp94T8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2F_pY47hE5U

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwTlLf1Oh8E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9u8woGVRGQ

[Владимир Петровић]

Reuters Today On The Crime In USA>

Two killed, children wounded in New Orleans drive-by shooting
(Reuters) - Two people were shot dead and three children wounded in a drive-by shooting outside a home in New Orleans on Sunday night, authorities said.


Riot erupts following shooting death of unarmed black teen in Missouri
(Reuters) - Rioting and looting erupted in Ferguson, Missouri, late on Sunday as protests over the killing of a black teenager by a police officer turned violent, law enforcement officials and media reports said.

USA NEED NEW JOHN EDGAR HOVER IN FBI

[Владимир Петровић]

Workers 3X More Likely to Get Fired in Private Sector Than in Gov't
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-...ector-govt

[Владимир Петровић]

Reuters>
Violence erupts again after killing of black Missouri teen
FERGUSON Mo. (Reuters) - Violence again erupted in the St. Louis area near the site of the police shooting death of an unarmed black teenager, according to local police, despite calls by U.S. President Barack Obama and activists for a measured response

[Захумље]

No Justice No Peace
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSHuWFO1-MM

[Захумље]

The Militarisation of the USA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpPAf5AbsMs

This topic was started a good few years ago on the old forum, which highlighted this development in the USA, at its very early stages.

In order to pursue globalization, by the 1% for the 1%......someone in the hidden power structures of USA, obvious felt; that the militarisation of ordinary police forces were necessary, or intrinsic to their programs.

We now see the ex-military tech from war zones of Afghanistan, now being transfer to local police forces.

Who are they actually protecting?

[Захумље]

Ronald Reagan’s Executive Order 12333: End-Running the Fourth Amendment; “Legalizing” Police State Surveillance

By Peter Van Buren
Global Research, September 22, 2014
The Dissenter
Region: USA
Theme: Police State & Civil Rights
5 2 0 10


surveillance-electronique
Historians of the Constitutional Era of the United States (1789-2001, RIP) will recall the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, the one that used to protect Americans against unreasonable and unwarranted searches.

The Supreme Court had generally held that searches required a warrant. That warrant could be issued only after law enforcement showed they had “probable cause.” That in turn had been defined by the Court to require a high standard of proof, “a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.”

The basic idea for more or less over 200 years: unless the government has a good, legal reason to look into your business, it couldn’t. As communications changed, the Fourth evolved to assert extend those same rights of privacy to phone calls, emails and texts, the same rules applying there as to physical searches.

That was Then

It was a good run. The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the people from their government. If the First Amendment’s right to speak out publicly was the people’s wall of security, then the Fourth Amendment’s right to privacy was its buttress. It was once thought that the government should neither be able to stop citizens from speaking nor peer into their lives. Folks, as our president now refers to us, should not have to fear the Knock on the Door in either their homes or The Homeland writ large.

In Post-Constitutional America (2001-Present), the government has taken a bloody box cutter to the original copy of the Constitution and thrown the Fourth Amendment in the garbage. The NSA revelations of Edward Snowden are, in that sense, not just a shock to the conscience but to the concept of privacy itself: Our government spies on us. All of us. Without suspicion. Without warrants. Without probable cause. Without restraint.

The government also invades our privacy in multiple other ways, all built around end-runs of the Fourth Amendment, clever wordplay, legal hacks and simple twisting of words. Thus you get illegally obtained information recycled into material usable in court via what is called parallel construction. You have the creation of “Constitution Free” zones at the U.S. border. The Department of Justice created a Post-Constitutional interpretation of the Fourth Amendment that allows it to access millions of records of Americans using only subpoenas, not search warrants, to grab folks’ emails by searching one web server instead of millions of individual homes. Under a twist of an old “privacy law,” doctors disclose your medical records to the NSA without your permission or knowledge. SWAT raids by local police designed to break into African-American businesses on harassment expeditions are also now OK.

The Center of It All: Executive Order 12333

The most egregious example of such word-twisting and sleazy legal manipulations to morph illegal government spying under the Fourth Amendment into topsy-turvy quasi-legal spying is the use of Executive Order 12333, E.O. 12333, what the spooks call “twelve triple three.” The Order dates from 1981, signed by Ronald Reagan to buff up what his predecessors limited in response to overzealous law enforcement activities. The Gipper would be mighty proud that his perhaps most lasting accomplishment was legalizing surveillance of every American citizen.

Back to today. Despite all the secret FISA court decisions and as yet uncovered legal memos, most collection of U.S. domestic communications and data is done under E.O. 12333, section 2.3 paragraph C.

Specifically, the one sentence that the government believes allows them to bypass the Fourth Amendment says the intelligence community can “collect, retain, or disseminate information concerning United States persons” if that information is “obtained in the course of a lawful foreign intelligence, counterintelligence, international narcotics or international terrorism investigation.”

So, the work-around for the Fourth Amendment is as follows: NSA collects massive amounts of data on foreigners, often by hoovering up every fragment of electronic stuff flowing around the U.S. it can. So, while purportedly looking for a single terrorist email enroute to Yemen (“the needle”), the NSA collects every single email from Google, Yahoo and Microsoft (“the haystack.”) Thus, any American’s emails caught in that net are considered to have been collected “incidentally” to the goal of finding that one terrorist email. The NSA claims that the Executive Order thus makes its mass-scale violations of the Fourth Amendment legal.

Tom Drake, perhaps the best-known NSA whistleblower prior to Edward Snowden, put it in simpler terms: “12333 is now being used as the legal justification for everything.”

Oh and hey reformers: Executive Orders by one president stay in force until another president changes or negates them. We could have one at work today written by George Washington. What that also means is that Congress, should they regain consciousness, can’t change an E.O. Congress could in theory pass a law making the contents of an E.O. invalid, but that presumes someone in Congress knows the order exists and what it says. Many E.O.’s are classified and if they are not, such as 12333, the legal documents behind them and FISA interpretations of them, likely are.

Snowden Knew

Again, as a historical note, executive orders– basically dictates from the president– once did not trump the Constitution. However, in Post-Constitutional America, they do.

As for this realization we have come upon, E.O. 12333, well, we’re all behind the curve. Edward Snowden, while still at NSA, wrote a now-famous email to the spy agency’s legal advisor, asking specifically whether an Executive Order has more legal force than an actual law passed by Congress, or indeed the Constitutional itself. The NSA’s answer was a bit convoluted, but said in a pinch the Constitution wins (wink wink), even while acting as if the opposite is true.

As General Michael Hayden, then head of the NSA, said in a blistering blast of Newspeak, “I am convinced that we are lawful because what it is we’re doing is reasonable.”

Ask Obama This Question

So let’s make it simple: Journalists with access to the president, ask this question directly: Why is E.O. 12333 being used today, interpreted by the FISA court or any other means, stating that the NSA’s surveillance of U.S. citizens is “reasonable,” and thus no warrant is required for the surveillance to continue and remain constitutional under the Fourth Amendment?

Of course getting an answer out of Obama will not happen. After all, he is the Constitutional law professor who studied the document the same way a burglar learns about an alarm system. TO BREAK IT BETTER.

BONUS: The stuff above is real amateur-level writing on E.O. 12333. When you are ready to dig in deep, get over to Marcy Wheeler’s blog. She is the smartest person working in journalism today on the subject. My debt to her is hereby acknowledged.

Peter Van Buren

[D1mon]

Hi everyone! I'd like to ask your advice about renting a car in USA. Gonna go there in couple weeks. Friend says to install some app which could help me. Checked this one https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/car-rent...?ls=1&mt=8. It has a really huge base, Share if u have more. Thanks!

[Брада]

White Americans Are Being Viciously Attacked Across The US By Democrat Thugs
Racist hate crimes are being committed around the country

http://www.infowars.com/white-americans-...rat-thugs/

[Ројалист]

[Громовник]

http://www.socialmatter.net/2017/06/30/a...ed-states/